
“It is more frightening but it is not less productive to go your own way, to form your own theatre company, to write and stage your own plays, to make your own films. You have an enormously greater chance of eventually presenting yourself to, and appealing to, an audience by striking out on your own, by making your own plays and films, than by submitting to the industrial model of the school and studio…You are not one of the myriad of interchangeable pieces, but a unique human being, and if you’ve got something to say, say it, and think well of yourself while you’re learning to say it better.” - David Mamet, True and False
All of us actors have something to say. What, where, when, why, and how we say it illustrates who we are in this great chaotic community of free thinkers. Since we were able to speak, we were the ones who spoke out of turn, spoke too much in class, and spoke up against authority.
This is the beginning of something which I hope will serve as an open forum for all of you fellow struggling actors out there who, despite your level of success, question your existence and ask yourself the big questions every day. Come here for inspiration, come here for self discovery, or just come here to bitch and moan. In no way do I consider myself an expert. For that matter, who hell is a true expert on this vicious art? I’m learning as I go along as all of us are.Through this exchange I would like all of us to learn from each others mishaps and breakthroughs.
At the end of each post I will pose a question or comment for future feedback from you the reader. I will rely on your feedback to generate future posts.
As you can probably tell, I recently re-read True and False by David Mamet. Being a former student of Sanford Meisner, Mamet cuts through all the bullshit in regards to an actor’s technique. Reacting as yourself and working freely from moment to moment is golden according to him. Book work, or the ” paint by numbers” approach to preparation, is useless and harmful to the actor. According to Mamet, “the only reason to rehearse is to learn to perform the play.” He stresses that exploring the meaning of the play and investigating the life of the character is a waste of time. ” There is no character, there are just lines on the page.” Well then, I wonder why he’s coercing the actor to surrender to the words of the playwright.
In part I agree that we as actors must cut through all the nonsense and strive for simplicity in our performance. Through the “reality of doing” the truth will unfold and natural inner life will awaken and become present for you and more importantly, the audience. I don’t agree that all book work is harmful. I believe by internally replacing the characters in the play with people you are close with in your daily life is helpful in ushering in a true light. Connecting the circumstances of the character with past experiences supports a truthful performance also. Most importantly, remaining connected to your breath as to access your true emotional core is essential to great acting. But, hell, I may be wrong. That’s what I love about acting. We are all striving for a truth almost unattainable. That my friends, is beautiful in itself.
I have been finding, on auditions, that the casting director, director, dude in the room, doesn’t care about a truthful performance. They just want you to act. On a recent audition I was told to act like the character Jesse Pinkman in AMC’s Breaking Bad. The casting director wanted me to enter the room high and use that as the basis of my performance. I did a pretty good read, but, needless to say, I walked out of the room discouraged.
While on an audition should you just give them the hammy acting they beg for or work for something real even if you risk botching it? Should you experiment during an audition?